 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Sep 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | Florida &, Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 11288 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
KenC wrote:
WHAT!!!!!,,,,,,,No More Tactical Neighborhood Watch KenI never noticed the Lumey Hands either...Go Figure...I Wonder Which Lume Lasts Longest...The Dial or the Hands
:P
IT'S FUNNY.....I'VE HAD THE WATCH FOR ABOUT A YEAR AND NEVER THOUGHT OF IT (I'M NOT A BIG "LUME FREAK"..................my night prowling days are over). I love the watch and it styling; it's just that I had to laugh when I finally noticed it!:D It's the nicest $50 watch I've ever had!
mcwright wrote:
KenC wrote:
Let me add that I am not complaining about the watch. I love the look and it is one that Invicta got right, but it was just plain stupid to put lume on lume for a watch that is supposed to be specifically designed for the nigh! :shock::D:D
Ken, Trias does the same thing with some of their glow-in-the-dark dial models. The hands have lume too. I had one and I couldn't read the time on it worth a darn. Unless you see black on black hands, assume the hands glow too! :D