TimeTechTalk.com Home

TimeTechTalk.com > 3T Official Brand Forums > Orsa Watch Co. > Monstrom compared to Sea Angler

Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You!

 Moderated by: 3T
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Monstrom compared to Sea Angler  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 11:49 am
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
ebiz4me
3T WIS


Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2007
Location: High Point, North Carolina USA
Posts: 1280
Status: 
Offline
 Can anyone compare the Monstrum size to the Sea Angler?  Are the cases the same size?  How 'bout a few comparision pics?  I'm thinking the Monstrum might be a bit big for my wrist.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 11:53 am
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
dadog13
3T WIS
 

Joined: Fri Nov 16th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 8
Status: 
Offline
 the sea angler is 45mm and the monstrum is 47mm...

I decided to go for the monstrum...I love big chunky diver watches...and the monstrum is just like that...love the look of it..and I agree with you that is big...and not for everybody wrist...
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 12:09 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
teddyhanna
Guest
 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status: 
Offline
 ebiz4me wrote: Can anyone compare the Monstrum size to the Sea Angler?  Are the cases the same size?  How 'bout a few comparision pics?  I'm thinking the Monstrum might be a bit big for my wrist.

The Monstrum was made from the Sea  Angler's case, the difference is the wider bezel, the crystal, and the crown, the lugs are also shaped differently.

47mm wide

55mm lugs to lugs

19mm thick

sapphire crystal

60 clicks rotating bezel.

Just thought maybe this would help you. 
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 12:27 pm
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
oagaspar
Site Founder


Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Akron, USA
Posts: 28866
Status: 
Offline
 the exact measurements of the Monstrum are 47mm 9to3....51.5mm 10to4 including the crown 55mm lug to lug and 18mm thick due to the 5mm thick domed saph crystal....the case is styled after the Sea Angler but is slightly larger in size and is a sandblasted finish opposed to bead blasted on the Sea Angler....because of the new swivel strap the Monstrum conforms to the wrist nicely and should be no problem in size for you Biz imho even though the Monstrum is Larger in all departmentswatch2.gifI will take a pic of the Angler and Monstrum side by side for you later today Buddyhand6.gif
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 12:48 pm
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
goldengrr
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Aug 25th, 2007
Location: Westchester County, New York USA
Posts: 338
Status: 
Offline
 Thanks. I too was going to ask for side by side shots. Need to keep us occupied until actually taking delivery!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 12:55 pm
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
teddyhanna
Guest
 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status: 
Offline
 Me to Oscar.  Post some pics side by side, like to see the difference  watch2.gif
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 01:21 pm
  PM Quote Reply
7th Post
oagaspar
Site Founder


Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Akron, USA
Posts: 28866
Status: 
Offline
 Q&D side by side...the Monstrum case is approximitely 1mm larger from side to side and lug to lug.....the major size difference is from 10 to 4 including the crown ...3 to 9 and thickness where the Monstrum has a size advantage of 2mm overall.watch2.gif

Attachment: Picture 001.jpg (Downloaded 278 times)
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 02:43 pm
  PM Quote Reply
8th Post
goldengrr
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Aug 25th, 2007
Location: Westchester County, New York USA
Posts: 338
Status: 
Offline
 That was fast, thanks! Visually, the Monstrum looks larger by a fair amount

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 02:54 pm
  PM Quote Reply
9th Post
ebiz4me
3T WIS


Joined: Wed Apr 4th, 2007
Location: High Point, North Carolina USA
Posts: 1280
Status: 
Offline
 Thanks Oscar for the comparison pics.  Monstrum does look larger.  I was on the list for the Monstrum, but hesitating because I'm getting away from HUGE watches.  Sold my Enzo's and LM-3.  Not sure if I'll go with this one.  Guess I got spoiled by my Ball Master II Diver...fantastic watch.  Thanks again for posting the pics....very helpful.

 

oagaspar wrote:
Q&D side by side...the Monstrum case is approximitely 1mm larger from side to side and lug to lug.....the major size difference is from 10 to 4 including the crown ...3 to 9 and thickness where the Monstrum has a size advantage of 2mm overall.watch2.gif

Last edited on Sat Nov 17th, 2007 02:55 pm by ebiz4me
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Nov 17th, 2007 06:07 pm
  PM Quote Reply
10th Post
IWR222
3T WIS


Joined: Fri Oct 20th, 2006
Location: Chorley, United Kingdom
Posts: 240
Status: 
Offline
 HOLY COW its bigger than the sea angler ,cant wait.

After seeing the yellow seiko i think that would be a fantastic combo in an orsa .lots of yellow and a black band.

I will keep on with colour ideas until the mother of pearl is abandonded ,its just wrong. Sorry to rant but mop is fine for ladies but not for me. ThumbsUp02.gif
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Nov 19th, 2007 08:50 pm
  PM Quote Reply
11th Post
teddyhanna
Guest
 

Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 
Status: 
Offline
 That Monstrum just "ROCK"
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 12:21 pm  
TimeTechTalk.com > 3T Official Brand Forums > Orsa Watch Co. > Monstrom compared to Sea Angler Top

Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2012 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.3768 seconds (75% database + 25% PHP). 31 queries executed.