 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sat Dec 15th, 2007 |
| Location: | Luxembourg |
| Posts: | 79 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
SHADY wrote:Panerai vs. the Hommages...I am seeing all these hommages coming in and wondering why buy the real thing?I was wondering the same thing myself. Given that some hommages are taking an expert watchmaker to tell the difference and they can keep time as well or better than a real true to life example, materials are almost the exact same if not exact, then why the exorbident price.
That's not true Danny. You don't have to be an expert to see the difference between a Panerai and a replica/homage!
The crafmanship of a real Luminor 1950 is exceptional. You can feel the hours of work. The case finish is flawless and the whole watch seems indestructible. It's a tool for a lifetime, that will most likely be in perfect shape in 50 years.
The in-house P.2004 movement itself is a work of art, and a major technical achievement (8 days power reserve, anti-shock system, second reset, etc...).
Comparing this movement with an off-the-shelf $100 ETA 2824 is like comparing a Suzuki with a Ferrari.
There's a HUGE difference. The price is justified in my opinion (developing in house movements cost millions).