 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Sep 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | Florida &, Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 11288 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
KenC wrote:Tony Duronio wrote:KenC wrote:Tony Duronio wrote:Did you have your coffee yet ol' buddy:D
http://www.timetechtalk.com/view_topic.php?id=17125&forum_id=1
and I think the 21 Jewel is a better movement than the 2824 This might be a 2834/2892??? I'm sure the experts will chime in.
As a matter of fact...no, but I am having it now...according to Pax's post, the watch was $100 more yesterday at $249....and it was about the 5th thread down!
Did you assume because your a "SENIOR" member of the forum, you wouldn't have to dig for infoPax miss quoted the price yesterday, it was $149. He just got so carried away at getting another Wisconsin Badger colored watch that his brain moved faster than his fingersgoofy
As a "SENIOR" member of the forum, I was doing my duty and correcting his gross error which no one else had done...even those that had already noticed his post!
You are lucky I was busy today... Did I say $249? I was just testing you guys...:shock: And yes I was happy to get another Badger watch... especially at $129 with 2836. So there!!goofy
Remember Tony, we don't want any age discrimination so we need to give Ken the little extra breathing room...
I'm sorry...who posted the wrong price? Ol' Ken who needs extra breathing room or young Pax? Hmmmmmmmmmmm!
