 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Feb 26th, 2006 |
| Location: | Oregon, USA |
| Posts: | 2897 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
The only difference is most of you know better today than you did back in 2000.
Claims of great quality Invicta’s sound as absurd to me as my claims that they "aren’t that bad" sound to many of you.
I just don't "get" this brand and I consider myself very lucky that I don't because It's never had the opportunity to disappoint me.
I've been watching Invicta only casually since 2000 but its taken until this summer for them to make a watch that I just had to have and thought was worth the risk.
One great watch every six years is not very impressive to me.
BTW the G10 is a cheap $20.00 chronograph. Invicta could use the ETA 251 series chronograph which is a much better chronograph but it costs twice as much. They were too cheap to use it in 2000 and as far as I know they are still too cheap to use it today.
Don't hate me cuz I have an opinion about everything :D
I just enjoy quality debates or discussions that challenge ones beliefs.
It’s good exercise for your brain to articulate your thoughts persuasively!
Last edited on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 03:59 pm by OldeCrow