e.avery
| Joined: | Tue Apr 4th, 2006 |
| Location: | Kentucky USA |
| Posts: | 2722 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
I guess I am confused by the quote. By having a home does he mean having a home and not having to run it, because I have a home and run it well would like a house keeper though. I guess he is saying that men like to have house keepers with sex privileges. Question is sex the pay off the partner is suppose to get for being a house keeper or is it just part of the job description? Not having to bother with sex is he stating not having to bother with finding someone to have sex with, and by doing so taking care of ones self in order to attract a mate and thus avoid any work that is normally associated with grooming and dating, or is he stating that no time or effort would have to be put into the sex act and thus would save time and energy. The quote seems to ask more questions then it solves. I guess I just do not understand the cost benefit equation that motivated the statement, call me simple.
|
