 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Thu Mar 26th, 2009 |
| Location: | Colorado USA |
| Posts: | 10254 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
stew77 wrote:exc-hulk wrote:
stew77 wrote:Sticking with the SUB 300...
Great shot Chris !
Since two days I look at the DOXA website.
Thanks Phil!
Trying to illustrate the thinner case of this sub 300 re-issue...they definitely nailed the vintage nod to the original vintage Sub 300T IMO.
Even with your manly wrist, I don't think you would find this one too small, but we each have our own preferences, and since you already have a sub 1200T, you've at least got a nice comparative Doxa in your excellent collection.
If you haven't already seen this nice comparison article by Dr. Peter McClean Millar comparing the re-issue to the original sub 300T and a few other Doxas here (including the sub 1200T), check it out.
(http://www.doxa300t.com/sub300/300searambler.htm)
Oh, btw...the 50th Anni Sub 300 re-issue includes a copy of the very cool book seen in this article "Doxa Sub A 50 Year Journey".
Yes, I already saw the article from Dr. Millar.
Great bonus with the book.
Like you know I own a SUB300T Divingstar.
I think she has the same size like the 50th Anni, except the case thickness.
My 300T is seldom on my wrist, probably because of the size
Oh yes! I had completely forgot about your awesome 300T Divingstar!
Well then, it's completely up to you...
