 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Apr 15th, 2007 |
| Location: | Perth, Australia |
| Posts: | 1268 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=9881
wonder what it sells for today in 2008? Not diggin the nuclear sign
http://www.thewatchquote.com/Blancpain-Fifty-Fathoms-self-winding-diver-s-watch-Flyback-Chronograph-or-Tourbillon-No_6046.htm
This one is nice too
The Stingray is a beauty of a watch woohoo.gif
I am with Huck. No nuclear signs for me, thanks. IMHO - the newly released BPFF on Hucky's second link are clearly expensive, beautiful and have that "cushion" shape enhanced by clean dials, the "overfilled" bezel ring, and the exaggerated inner chapter ring which gives me the impression that the BPFF is a very thick watch (I know it isn't). The Stingray is an acceptable substitute, and it might even survive a mesh transplant! :shock:
Rock on, Pax - I think I am already convinced yourock.gif
The Precista PRS-50 is a closer "homage" to that vintage FF, but - nah, that is not "me".
OK - time to e-mail Yao........
Cheers you guys - IanM
